Who Has to Move During Divorce Proceeding, Wife or Husband?


Many couples filing for divorce chose to remain living together while the divorce is pending.  Sometimes couples remain living together for financial reasons, sometimes because they don’t want to be apart from the children, and sometimes because both parties are both too stubborn to move.  However, in many of these cases a time comes when it is no longer in the parties’ best interests to remain living together.  At that point, what happens?  Who has to move during divorce proceeding?

Illinois Law Allows for a Temporary Remedy as to Has to Move During Divorce Proceeding 

Section 501(c-2) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act allows for a party to request the Court grant them “exclusive possession of the marital residence.”  This is only a temporary remedy during the divorce proceeding and does not necessarily mean that the party remaining in the marital residence will be rewarded the marital residence in the divorce.
When a Motion for Exclusive Possession comes before the Court, the judge considers whether the couple occupying the same residence jeopardizes the physical or mental well-being of the parties or their children.  The Court can only grant this remedy upon due notice and a full hearing unless the Court waives that requirement for good cause shown.

The Court’s Goal is to Preserve  Status Quo for Children and Well Being of the Parties

That brings up the question of how the Court determines who has to leave?  During the dissolution of marriage process, the Court attempts to maintain the “status quo.”  If the parties have children, the Court will look at keeping the children in marital residence.  Which means the Court will look at which parent was more responsible for getting the children ready for school, taking them to school, picking them up, helping with homework, and other issues related to the children.
The Court will also take into account what role each party played in disrupting the physical or mental well-being of the other party and disrupting the status quo.  The Court also factors in financial considerations, such as who can afford to maintain the marital residence or who can afford to pay rent.

An Order of Protection, if Granted, Decides Who Has to Move During a pending Divorce

If either party has experienced physical violence or threats of physical violence, the Court can then grant an Order of Protection on an Emergency Basis.  The Court can grant an Emergency Order of Protection without notice and hearing. However, once the Court grants the emergency, the other spouse must be notified and will receive a chance to be heard.  The Court will then hold a hearing on whether to extend the Order of Protection and may extend it for up to two years.  If an order of protection is entered, the party whom the Order is entered against will be forced to leave the marital residence.

So, Who Has to Move, Husband of Wife?  The Court May Decide 

Every dissolution of marriage case is different.  If the parties can no longer live together and cannot agree on who will remain in the marital residence, the Court makes that determination.

If you are going through a divorce and where you need to address has to moves out during the pending divorce, feel free to contact our office today to schedule a confidential consultation.  Our team of experienced and top rated family law and divorce attorneys representing your interests during and after divorce .

THIS ARTICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED AT:    https://illinoislawforyou.com/divorce/who-has-to-move-out-during-divorce/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Divorced Parents Disagree About the COVID-19 Vaccine 

Image
  There is a lot of disagreement about vaccinations for children and the argument between parents with differing views on this subject is not a new one.  Illinois family law attorneys representing parents in this type of disagreement have worked throughout the years to avoid the problem in its entirety by addressing the issue of vaccination in the parenting agreement, now called an Allocation Judgment.  A prior agreement on how to handle vaccinations will give clarity as parents deal with the COVID-19 vaccine.   COVID-19 Vaccine Questions from Divorced Parents There are a number of questions and co-parenting issues surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. Here are five of the most frequently asked questions we are seeing in our Chicago family law practice: 1. What If the Other Parent Will Not Get the COVID-19 Vaccine? We just saw a judge in Cook County strip a mother of her parenting time because she had not received the COVID-19 vaccine.  The parents were before the court on a child support
Read more

Contempt For Not Following A Parenting Plan

Image
  Is Your Ex Not Allowing Parenting Time with Your Child? If your ex is not allowing parenting time your child, can you hold them in contempt ? The short answer is yes.  Everything in the field of family law often draws a response from the lawyer which sounds like “ it depends. ”  The reason for the “it depends” relates to the parenting order itself and whether clarity exists.  One cannot be held in contempt if there is not a clear order lacking ambiguity. There was a time in court that we would enter orders that would allow the parents to set the schedule themselves.  Something like “Mary and Jack shall facilitate parenting time in the best needs of the child.”  Well, what exactly did that mean?  And if Mary thinks it is in the best interests of the child to see Jack once a week (or less) and Jack thinks he should see his daughter every day, then clearly, we have a problem.  Every one of these cases came back into court to have the judge decide what was in the child’s best interest re
Read more

Illinois Law Update – Can a Guardian Ad Litem Speak to a Therapist in My Case?

Image
The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act in recent years gave the courts in Illinois the authority to order therapy for a minor child, family counseling for one or more of the parties and the child, or parental education for one or more of the parties if it finds that the parents or all parties agree, that the child’s physical health is endangered or that the child’s emotional development is impaired, or that an abuse of allocated parenting time has occurred, or, one or both of the parties violated the judgment with regard to conduct affecting or in the presence of the minor child.  {See 750 ILCS 5/607.6 regarding same}.  However, the same statute previously explicitly indicated that all therapy would be confidential. As of August 13, 2021, Illinois enacted Public Act 102-349, and the statute is now modified.  It no longer has a provision stating that therapy would be strictly confidential.  This kept all information obtained by a Guardian Ad Litem from a therapist out o
Read more