Competing Divorce Jurisdiction in Ben Zobrist’s Divorce: Which State Wins?


Chicago natives may now know that Cubs player Ben Zobrist filed for a legal separation from his wife, Julianna Zobrist, in Tennessee, citing marital misconduct. Meanwhile, Julianna Zobrist has filed for dissolution of their marriage in Cook County, Illinois. Local reports seem to indicate that Ben Zobrist filed before Julianna Zobrist, but it is unclear since the filings were so close together. Of course, the legal question in all of this is, which state has divorce jurisdiction?

Divorce Jurisdiction and Illinois Residency Requirement

In order to file for divorce in Illinois, you have to be a resident of the state of Illinois for ninety (90) days or more. So, clearly, by Ben Zobrist's wife filing for divorce in Illinois she is alleging that she is an Illinois resident. Tennessee, presumably, has their own residency requirement for filing separation or divorce proceedings.

Exceptions to “First to File ‘Wins’ Jurisdiction”

Generally speaking, the first petition filed “wins” jurisdiction, with some exceptions. The first person to file usually secures jurisdiction in the state they filed in, but this can be challenged. For example, if someone files first, but in a state where they do not meet that state’s residency requirement, that could be grounds to have the first filed petition dismissed, depending upon local laws.

“Home State” Divorce Jurisdiction When Children are Involved

Further, if there are minor children involved, their Allocation of Parental Responsibilities (formerly known as Custody) has to be adjudicated in their “home state”. The home state is the state where the minor children resided for the six (6) months directly prior to filing (periods of temporary absence for vacations, etc. are not included in the six-month calculation.) So, even if the first filed petition would technically win jurisdiction, if there are minor children and that first filed petition wasn’t filed in the children’s home state it gets complicated. You are faced with one court deciding the merits of the divorce like property division and support, and a different court in a totally separate jurisdiction deciding on a parenting time schedule and allocation of parental responsibilities (previously known as Custody in Illinois).

That is a lot of attorneys and a lot of litigation between two different states. So, generally in those sorts of proceedings, the person who filed in the divorce jurisdiction that is not the home state (even if it was the first filing filed) will dismiss their action voluntarily so that everything can be litigated in the same state, to conserve resources.

Divorce Jurisdiction Complicated By Unique Property Division Issues

Another scenario where first to file may not win jurisdiction is in situations with unique property division issues. For example, some military pensions and retirement accounts can only be divided by a specific state, until the former/current service member agrees to the division. In that scenario, even if a spouse was “first to file” if it wasn’t in the state which has authority to divide the spouse’s military retirement, the person may dismiss their case in favor of going with the jurisdiction which can divide the asset.

It will be interesting to see how the jurisdictional issue in the Ben Zobrist divorce (or legal separation) case is resolved. We suspect that someone will file a Motion to Dismiss the other’s case; or, that someone will withdraw their petition, but it certainly raises serious questions about competing jurisdictions in domestic relations proceedings.

In the meantime, while we wait to see what happens with the Zobrist divorce jurisdiction battle - Go Cubs, go!

THIS ARTICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED AT: https://illinoislawforyou.com/support/ignoring-income-withholding-order-pay-penalties/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Divorced Parents Disagree About the COVID-19 Vaccine 

Image
  There is a lot of disagreement about vaccinations for children and the argument between parents with differing views on this subject is not a new one.  Illinois family law attorneys representing parents in this type of disagreement have worked throughout the years to avoid the problem in its entirety by addressing the issue of vaccination in the parenting agreement, now called an Allocation Judgment.  A prior agreement on how to handle vaccinations will give clarity as parents deal with the COVID-19 vaccine.   COVID-19 Vaccine Questions from Divorced Parents There are a number of questions and co-parenting issues surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. Here are five of the most frequently asked questions we are seeing in our Chicago family law practice: 1. What If the Other Parent Will Not Get the COVID-19 Vaccine? We just saw a judge in Cook County strip a mother of her parenting time because she had not received the COVID-19 vaccine.  The parents were before the court on a child support
Read more

Contempt For Not Following A Parenting Plan

Image
  Is Your Ex Not Allowing Parenting Time with Your Child? If your ex is not allowing parenting time your child, can you hold them in contempt ? The short answer is yes.  Everything in the field of family law often draws a response from the lawyer which sounds like “ it depends. ”  The reason for the “it depends” relates to the parenting order itself and whether clarity exists.  One cannot be held in contempt if there is not a clear order lacking ambiguity. There was a time in court that we would enter orders that would allow the parents to set the schedule themselves.  Something like “Mary and Jack shall facilitate parenting time in the best needs of the child.”  Well, what exactly did that mean?  And if Mary thinks it is in the best interests of the child to see Jack once a week (or less) and Jack thinks he should see his daughter every day, then clearly, we have a problem.  Every one of these cases came back into court to have the judge decide what was in the child’s best interest re
Read more

Illinois Law Update – Can a Guardian Ad Litem Speak to a Therapist in My Case?

Image
The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act in recent years gave the courts in Illinois the authority to order therapy for a minor child, family counseling for one or more of the parties and the child, or parental education for one or more of the parties if it finds that the parents or all parties agree, that the child’s physical health is endangered or that the child’s emotional development is impaired, or that an abuse of allocated parenting time has occurred, or, one or both of the parties violated the judgment with regard to conduct affecting or in the presence of the minor child.  {See 750 ILCS 5/607.6 regarding same}.  However, the same statute previously explicitly indicated that all therapy would be confidential. As of August 13, 2021, Illinois enacted Public Act 102-349, and the statute is now modified.  It no longer has a provision stating that therapy would be strictly confidential.  This kept all information obtained by a Guardian Ad Litem from a therapist out o
Read more