Discretionary Bonus Accrued During the Marriage but Issued After Divorce

  

 When it comes to divorce, money is always a hot point of contention especially when one spouse earns a discretionary bonus that accrued during the marriage but paid after the divorce judgment issued. With the end of the year approaching and receiving an annual bonus may bring concerns for a person going through a divorce in Illinois.  For the spouse that learns her ex received a bonus shortly after the divorce is final, it is only natural to question whether it is subject to division as a marital asset. In the Illinois case, In re Marriage of Wendt, the Appellate Court ruled no. The Appellate Court held that a non-vested discretionary bonus accrued during the marriage, but received after entry of a judgment for dissolution of marriage, is not marital property.

Bonus Accrued During Marriage but Non-Marital Property?

The parties filed for divorce in July 2010. Scott Wendt, a software developer for Citadel, received a considerable bonus payment for 2008, but it was not paid until early 2009.  Scott received no bonus for 2009 and he received a bonus for 2010 that was payable in 2011 and one for 2011 that payable in early 2012.  In September 2012, the trial court entered a Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage with an accompanying Marital Settlement Agreement. Additionally, the trial court entered an order awarding Scott's 2012 bonus payable in early 2013 to him after a finding that it was his non-marital property. Scott’s wife, Allison appealed the decision to the Illinois Appellate Court. The Court affirmed the trial court's decision and held that Scott's 2012 bonus was non-marital property.

So why was this bonus considered non-marital property?

The issue turned on the fact that the bonuses that Scott received were not guaranteed, and were not spelled out in an employment contract as a contractual benefit. Rather, the bonuses were purely discretionary and analogous to accrued vacation and sick time, which the Court has identified as non-marital property because of its speculative nature.

Bonuses were Discretionary and Not Tied to Husband's Job Performance

The Appellate court distinguished Scott's bonuses from non-vested pensions, stating that employees have contractual rights to a non-vested pension under an employment agreement.  Whereas, Scott's agreement with Citadel provided that all bonuses were discretionary and depended on factors other than Scott's performance, such as the overall performance of the company. Additionally, even though Scott received bonuses for 2008, 2010, 2011, and 2012, Scott did not receive a bonus for 2009 and contributed the lack of such bonus to the overall performance of the Company, which was a factor out of Scott's control.

Taking those facts into consideration, the Illinois Appellate Court found that Scott's bonus was his non-marital property and not subject to division.

Consult with an Experienced Chicago Divorce Attorney

Dividing assets in an Illinois divorce can be complicated, especially when a couple has multiple retirement investment accounts that include a mix like bonuses, pension plans, and 401(k) accounts. Be sure your rights to and share of pension plans, 401(k)s and any bonuses are protected in your divorce. Feel free to contact Anderson & Boback when you need trusted legal advice from a Chicago family law attorney. With our extensive experience representing clients in high asset and high-income divorces, you can count on us to achieve the best outcome in your divorce.

THIS ARTICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED AT: https://illinoislawforyou.com/property-division/discretionary-bonus-accrued-during-marriage-but-issued-after-divorce/

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Divorced Parents Disagree About the COVID-19 Vaccine 

Image
  There is a lot of disagreement about vaccinations for children and the argument between parents with differing views on this subject is not a new one.  Illinois family law attorneys representing parents in this type of disagreement have worked throughout the years to avoid the problem in its entirety by addressing the issue of vaccination in the parenting agreement, now called an Allocation Judgment.  A prior agreement on how to handle vaccinations will give clarity as parents deal with the COVID-19 vaccine.   COVID-19 Vaccine Questions from Divorced Parents There are a number of questions and co-parenting issues surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. Here are five of the most frequently asked questions we are seeing in our Chicago family law practice: 1. What If the Other Parent Will Not Get the COVID-19 Vaccine? We just saw a judge in Cook County strip a mother of her parenting time because she had not received the COVID-19 vaccine.  The parents were before...
Read more

Illinois Law Update – Can a Guardian Ad Litem Speak to a Therapist in My Case?

Image
The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act in recent years gave the courts in Illinois the authority to order therapy for a minor child, family counseling for one or more of the parties and the child, or parental education for one or more of the parties if it finds that the parents or all parties agree, that the child’s physical health is endangered or that the child’s emotional development is impaired, or that an abuse of allocated parenting time has occurred, or, one or both of the parties violated the judgment with regard to conduct affecting or in the presence of the minor child.  {See 750 ILCS 5/607.6 regarding same}.  However, the same statute previously explicitly indicated that all therapy would be confidential. As of August 13, 2021, Illinois enacted Public Act 102-349, and the statute is now modified.  It no longer has a provision stating that therapy would be strictly confidential.  This kept all information obtained by a Guardian Ad Litem fro...
Read more

Changes to the Illinois Child Relocation Statute in Family Law for 2022

Image
  Oftentimes while a family law case is pending, parents will need or want to move with their minor children . The child relocation law in Illinois as of 2021 indicated that you need to seek approval for relocation from the Court if you want to move your minor child(ren) more than 25 miles away from their current residence. However, under the Illinois statute, as written in 2021, it indicates that “a parent who has been allocated a majority of parenting time or either parent who has been allocated equal parenting time may seek to relocate with a child.”  Judges and attorneys have interpreted this section to mean that until a parenting time schedule is in place, a parent cannot seek relocation, because it is unknown if that parent has the “majority” of parenting time or “equal” parenting time, until, at a minimum, there is a parenting time schedule in a custody order.  New Temporary Child Relocation Law Many Judges have also been interpreting the child relocation law to ...
Read more