Thinking of Spending or Hiding Money Before Divorce? Think Again.


Should you be hiding money before divorce? Or, what about spending or transferring money before divorce?

I seem to get a lot of questions like this lately.

When people are considering a divorce and seeking out a divorce attorney, they always want to know what they can do with their money.  Can they take all of their money out of the bank?  Can they take half of it and secrete it from their spouse?  Can they spend it?

Dissipation and Spending Money Before Getting a Divorce

Under the law, when a party in a divorce case takes money and spends it, it can be considered dissipation. For such spending to qualify as dissipation, the money must have been taken during a time when the marriage was undergoing an "irretrievable breakdown" and must have been spent on something not of a marital purpose.

Most marriages start breaking down long before the first divorce petition is filed, so spending the money a month before you file for divorce will still be considered dissipation.  There is no bright line to figure out what is dissipation and what is not.

  • If the money was taken and spent on gambling, I believe that would be considered dissipation.
  • If the money was taken and used to pay the mortgage, it might be considered dissipation, or it might not.

The facts of each case are different, and no hard-line rule applies.

Financial Records and Money Used for “Marital Purpose”

When you are undergoing a divorce, all of your financial records will be scrutinized.  It's important that you are able to document and account for all expenditures.  If you take cash out of your account and have no records demonstrating what it was spent on, your spouse may allege that you have dissipated those monies.  If you can demonstrate that the money was used for a legitimate marital purpose, then it is not dissipation.  Poor record-keeping can lead to a claim of dissipation.

Making Decisions About Money Before Divorce

To make your case run smoother, I would recommend that you do not remove funds from your bank accounts.  It only scares your spouse and makes them believe that you are going to spend it. That leads to unwarranted court attention and a waste of everyone's time.  Instead, speak to your spouse about dividing the money and placing it in separate accounts.  That way, both of you feel comfortable that the money won't be spent by the other, and each of you has a heads up about the withdrawal. Communication about the money can save a lot of unnecessary hours in court.

If you are wondering about large money decisions when involved in or contemplating divorce, it is recommended that you speak with an experienced attorney as soon as possible. Contact us today so our divorce attorneys can provide the legal guidance you need about divorce and divorce-related financial issues like spending or hiding money before divorce.

THIS ARTICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED AT: https://illinoislawforyou.com/divorce/spending-hiding-money-before-divorce/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Divorced Parents Disagree About the COVID-19 Vaccine 

Image
  There is a lot of disagreement about vaccinations for children and the argument between parents with differing views on this subject is not a new one.  Illinois family law attorneys representing parents in this type of disagreement have worked throughout the years to avoid the problem in its entirety by addressing the issue of vaccination in the parenting agreement, now called an Allocation Judgment.  A prior agreement on how to handle vaccinations will give clarity as parents deal with the COVID-19 vaccine.   COVID-19 Vaccine Questions from Divorced Parents There are a number of questions and co-parenting issues surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine. Here are five of the most frequently asked questions we are seeing in our Chicago family law practice: 1. What If the Other Parent Will Not Get the COVID-19 Vaccine? We just saw a judge in Cook County strip a mother of her parenting time because she had not received the COVID-19 vaccine.  The parents were before the court on a child support
Read more

Contempt For Not Following A Parenting Plan

Image
  Is Your Ex Not Allowing Parenting Time with Your Child? If your ex is not allowing parenting time your child, can you hold them in contempt ? The short answer is yes.  Everything in the field of family law often draws a response from the lawyer which sounds like “ it depends. ”  The reason for the “it depends” relates to the parenting order itself and whether clarity exists.  One cannot be held in contempt if there is not a clear order lacking ambiguity. There was a time in court that we would enter orders that would allow the parents to set the schedule themselves.  Something like “Mary and Jack shall facilitate parenting time in the best needs of the child.”  Well, what exactly did that mean?  And if Mary thinks it is in the best interests of the child to see Jack once a week (or less) and Jack thinks he should see his daughter every day, then clearly, we have a problem.  Every one of these cases came back into court to have the judge decide what was in the child’s best interest re
Read more

Illinois Law Update – Can a Guardian Ad Litem Speak to a Therapist in My Case?

Image
The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act in recent years gave the courts in Illinois the authority to order therapy for a minor child, family counseling for one or more of the parties and the child, or parental education for one or more of the parties if it finds that the parents or all parties agree, that the child’s physical health is endangered or that the child’s emotional development is impaired, or that an abuse of allocated parenting time has occurred, or, one or both of the parties violated the judgment with regard to conduct affecting or in the presence of the minor child.  {See 750 ILCS 5/607.6 regarding same}.  However, the same statute previously explicitly indicated that all therapy would be confidential. As of August 13, 2021, Illinois enacted Public Act 102-349, and the statute is now modified.  It no longer has a provision stating that therapy would be strictly confidential.  This kept all information obtained by a Guardian Ad Litem from a therapist out o
Read more